Tughlaq Dynasty (1320-1413)
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq (Ghazi Malik) and His Reign
Intervention in Bengal Civil War:
During Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq’s reign, a significant civil war erupted in Bengal between two brothers, Nasiruddin and Alauddin. This conflict threatened the stability of the region, and Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq, seeing the need for central intervention, marched his forces to Bengal. His intervention was decisive, restoring order and reinforcing the authority of the Delhi Sultanate in Bengal.
Death of Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq:
Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq’s reign was cut short in 1325 when he died under mysterious circumstances. After returning from a successful campaign, a wooden pavilion built by his son, Juna Khan (later known as Muhammad bin Tughlaq), collapsed on him. There has been speculation among historians about whether this incident was an accident or a deliberate act orchestrated by Juna Khan, as the structure’s collapse led to his immediate ascension to the throne.
Muhammad Bin Tughlaq (Juna Khan) – The Mad Monarch or Mixture of Opposites
Early Reign:
Muhammad bin Tughlaq, known for his intellectual capabilities, ascended the throne in 1325. His reign began with a decade of relative tranquility (1325-1335), during which he consolidated his power and focused on administrative reforms. However, the latter half of his reign (1335-1351) was marred by a series of ill-conceived projects and rebellions that earned him the titles “Mad Monarch” and “Mixture of Opposites.”
Five Notable Projects and Their Failures:
- Increased Taxes in Doab:
- Muhammad bin Tughlaq attempted to increase revenue by imposing higher taxes in the fertile Doab region between the Ganges and Yamuna rivers. Unfortunately, this coincided with a severe famine, leading to widespread hardship and rebellion. The tax increase was eventually repealed, but the damage to the state’s finances and the people’s loyalty was irreversible.
- Shift of Capital to Daulatabad:
- Tughlaq decided to move the capital from Delhi to Deogir in the Deccan region, renaming it Daulatabad. His reasoning was to have a more centrally located capital that could better control the entire subcontinent. However, the forced migration of the population from Delhi to Daulatabad resulted in significant suffering and death. The scheme failed due to the logistical challenges and the eventual return to Delhi after eight years, further draining the state’s resources.
- Introduction of Token Currency:
- Muhammad bin Tughlaq introduced copper coins as token currency to address a shortage of silver. However, the poorly managed system led to widespread counterfeiting, as people started minting their own coins. The currency rapidly lost value, leading to economic chaos and the eventual withdrawal of the token currency.
- Khorasan Expedition:
- Muhammad bin Tughlaq planned an ambitious military expedition to conquer Khorasan and Iraq. He raised a large army and imposed heavy taxes to fund the campaign, but the project was abandoned before it even began. The resources spent on this futile endeavor weakened the state financially and militarily.
- Qarachil Expedition:
- The Qarachil expedition was aimed at securing the northern frontiers and expanding into the Himalayan region. However, the campaign ended in disaster, with heavy losses for the Tughlaq forces. The failure of this expedition further tarnished Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s reputation.
These projects exemplify the reasons why Muhammad bin Tughlaq is often viewed as a ruler of extremes, capable of grand vision but also of catastrophic failures. His unpredictable and often contradictory decisions led to widespread discontent and rebellion.
Rebellions and Unpopularity
Throughout his reign, Muhammad bin Tughlaq faced numerous rebellions, including:
- Rebellion of Jalaluddin Ahsan of Madurai:
- Jalaluddin Ahsan, governor of Madurai, declared independence in 1335, establishing the Madurai Sultanate. Muhammad bin Tughlaq was unable to suppress this rebellion, leading to the loss of the southernmost regions of his empire.
- Ainul Mulk and the Revolt in Gujarat:
- Ainul Mulk, the governor of Gujarat, rebelled against Tughlaq’s authority. The rebellion was part of a broader pattern of dissatisfaction with Tughlaq’s harsh policies and unpredictable rule.
- Revolt of Foreign Amirs in Daulatabad (1337):
- The foreign nobles stationed in Daulatabad, dissatisfied with Tughlaq’s rule, rebelled and attempted to capture the city. The revolt was eventually suppressed, but it highlighted the deep-seated unrest within the empire.
- Establishment of the Bahmani Kingdom:
- Hasan Gangu Bahmani, a former general under Tughlaq, led a successful revolt in the Deccan, capturing Daulatabad and founding the Bahmani Kingdom in 1347. This marked the permanent loss of the Deccan region from the Delhi Sultanate’s control.
Economic Policies and Decline
Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s introduction of token currency earned him the moniker “Prince of Moneyers,” as he attempted to revolutionize the economy through innovative but ultimately disastrous policies. The failure of the token currency led to widespread economic instability, with every household, particularly among Hindus, turning into a mint to produce counterfeit coins, further exacerbating the crisis.
Khalifa of Cairo and Religious Controversy
In 1345, Muhammad bin Tughlaq was recognized as the legitimate ruler of India by the Khalifa of Cairo, providing him with a degree of religious legitimacy. However, his harsh punishments and erratic behavior led many to question his piety. Ibn Battuta, who served as a Qazi (judge) in Delhi under Tughlaq, documented the Sultan’s reign in his travelogue, Rehla, and criticized Tughlaq for his cruelty, noting the frequent execution of rebels and dissidents.
The Famine and Diwan-e-Kohi
During his reign, a severe famine struck the northern parts of India, further weakening the empire. In response, Muhammad bin Tughlaq established the Diwan-e-Kohi, a separate department of agriculture, to improve agricultural productivity and alleviate the famine. However, the department’s efforts were largely unsuccessful, and the famine persisted, contributing to the decline of Tughlaq’s popularity.
Death and Legacy
Muhammad bin Tughlaq died in 1351, exhausted by the continuous rebellions and failures that had plagued his reign. Despite his grand ambitions, his rule is often remembered for its failures rather than its successes.
Firuz Shah Tughlaq (1351-1388) – The Peaceful Sultan
Military Campaigns:
Firuz Shah Tughlaq ascended the throne reluctantly, fearing the immense responsibility. Unlike his predecessor, Firuz Shah was a peace-loving ruler, focusing on administration rather than conquest. However, his military campaigns were largely unsuccessful:
- Expeditions against Bengal (1353-1359):
- Firuz Shah led campaigns against Haji Ilyas of Bengal but was forced to retreat. In 1359, he besieged the fort of Bengal, leading to a peace settlement with Haji Ilyas’s son, Sikander Shah.
- Other Expeditions:
- His other military expeditions, such as those against the Rajputs and in the south, also ended in failure, further diminishing the empire’s territorial control.
Administrative Reforms:
Firuz Shah’s reign was notable for several administrative reforms:
- He reintroduced the Jagir system, which had been abolished by Alauddin Khilji.
- He levied four kinds of taxes according to Quranic law: Kharaj (land tax), Zakat (charity tax), Jizya (tax on non-Muslims), and Khums (one-fifth of war booty).
- Firuz Shah also focused on public welfare, constructing 150 wells and 4 canals, establishing a department of charity (Diwan-e-Khairat), and founding a free hospital in Delhi (Dar-us-Shafa).
Cultural Contributions:
Firuz Shah established a new capital at Firuzabad and removed two monoliths of Ashoka from Delhi, displaying them prominently. His reign also saw the rise of his minister, Khan-i-Jahan Maqbool, who became powerful towards the end of Firuz Shah’s reign.
Slavery:
Firuz Shah Tughlaq maintained a large number of slaves, reportedly numbering 18,000 at one point. These slaves were used for various administrative and public works, reflecting the Sultan’s reliance on a vast, controlled labor force.
Death and Succession:
Firuz Shah died in 1388, and his death marked the beginning of the decline of the Tughlaq dynasty. His grandson, Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq II, succeeded him but was soon murdered by his cousin Abu Bakar. The subsequent rulers, including Nasiruddin Muhammad, were unable to hold the empire together.
The End of the Tughlaq Dynasty
Invasion of Timur:
The final blow to the Tughlaq dynasty came with the invasion of Timur in 1398. Timur’s forces sacked Delhi in 1399, leaving the city in ruins. He appointed Khizr Khan as his viceroy in India, effectively ending the Tughlaq dynasty’s control.
Confusion over the Last Ruler:
There is some confusion regarding the last ruler of the Tughlaq dynasty.
Certainly!
Confusion Over the Last Ruler of the Tughlaq Dynasty
The confusion surrounding the last ruler of the Tughlaq dynasty often arises from the overlapping and contested claims about the end of the dynasty’s rule. There are two main figures mentioned in this context: Nasiruddin Muhammad Tughlaq and Mahmud Shah Tughlaq. Here’s a breakdown of the two:
- Nasiruddin Muhammad Tughlaq:
- Reign: Nasiruddin Muhammad Tughlaq was a ruler who ascended the throne after the death of his father, Sultan Humayun, around 1394. His reign was marked by internal strife and the weakening of the Tughlaq dynasty. Nasiruddin’s reign saw the empire shrink due to revolts and the rise of independent states.
- End of Reign: Nasiruddin Muhammad Tughlaq’s rule ended in the chaos following the invasion of Timur. After Timur’s departure in 1399, the Tughlaq empire was in disarray, and Nasiruddin’s authority was largely nominal, with real power fragmented among local rulers and rival factions.
- Mahmud Shah Tughlaq:
- Reign: Mahmud Shah Tughlaq (sometimes referred to as Mahmud Nasiruddin in some sources) is often considered the last significant ruler of the Tughlaq dynasty. He ascended the throne around 1399-1400, after the reign of Nasiruddin Muhammad Tughlaq.
- Conflict with Khizr Khan: Mahmud Shah’s rule was challenged by Khizr Khan, the founder of the Sayyid dynasty, who was appointed as Timur’s viceroy in India. Khizr Khan gradually consolidated power and eventually became the de facto ruler, although Mahmud Shah nominally remained the sultan until his death in 1413.
- Possible Overlap: The confusion may stem from the overlap in the titles and the period of their reigns. In some accounts, Nasiruddin Muhammad Tughlaq and Mahmud Shah Tughlaq may be treated as distinct individuals, while in others, Mahmud Shah might be considered a continuation of Nasiruddin’s lineage or a separate ruler altogether.
- End of the Tughlaq Dynasty: Mahmud Shah Tughlaq is generally regarded as the last ruler of the Tughlaq dynasty. His death in 1413 marks the end of the Tughlaq dynasty’s reign, leading to the rise of the Sayyid dynasty under Khizr Khan.